Sadhu (poem for mel)
January 20, 2012 at 3:43 am 6 comments
(this is a very, very rough draft, but felt I had to do something with the complicated memory that is now surfacing)To utter an epitaph for you – too soon,
too soon, and always too late – would require
not only
credentials I can’t
offer, and more than the memory of
the ink and smoke
plumage trailing you that
was my instant image of your
name, a name I’ve known since I can
recall anything. And your smile
that could have been a wince – oh you
were the opposite
of our dramatic masks, our
homage to your ancestry’s claim
on theater’s inception – comedy and tragedy played
themselves on your thin lips in a tug of war over
your teeth and what they held: lit. I was a partial
observer, even of those afternoons, the thumping
printers pumping out
the leaflets and fliers and
letters I’m not persuaded you ever
thought much of -
you weren’t a follower, a believer, but something
even rarer, a man with hands and a clear
understanding of what he can and cannot do
with them. This is not, I know, the opposite
of holiness. My father loved you. Who
didn’t? I remember, sometimes, I would bug
you with questions, trying to understand the
machines and the colors you fed them; you didn’t
really put up with me more than you put
up with anyone else. I never
minded. You were there, always, along
with the sky, democracy,
California. The thing about you, old
man, dying perhaps, in the same house where I
visited long days, where I ate my first
perfect exotic apricot, where caterpillars
spun, where once your son showed
me the giant plastic bags of
quartz and rocks
you had collected together
on a hike with a flashlight and it
seemed unbelievable that such
riches could exist,
could persist under a carport like yours, stored
in everyday garbage
bags and glitteringĀ - what
I would say of you – then,
now – is not that you were kind or nice
or upstanding, though possibly
you were those things.
But I don’t think you cared about that, and I don’t,
either. Imprinted here
something more solid, more dear, more
dear than I would like to admit, these years
in the future that seem impossible, and
the predicament of an end arriving
before I’ve even understood
how the middle is
going – (it occurs to me, there is
no way to construct a eulogy about
someone other than
yourself, and your own grief – who
am I mourning, who is really
dying?) -
how you were quite
plainly unadulterated with anything that was
not-you, and truly, how much closer to
the sacred heart of things can
we get?
I cannot say that any statue I’ve
met, any radiant figure or
transcendent star of
the spiritual path can claim it
in quite the same way.
And so – what, sweet soul, can I say? but that
your daily fulminations, ministrations of
gears and wrenching, gleaming arms -
grinning and
discerning who-knows-
what through the haze of your rhythmic domain -
who knows what you were
really thinking. What
I cannot speak
is what I want to say – and what I want
to say is unspeakable – perhaps you, too,
would agree, run it
through a machine, and to diminish
any argument to the
contrary, deftly and without
affectation but with the utter grace
that recedes from us when we try to
reproduce it and force it and
work it- you would have me, I think, roll
this up
and smoke it till it’s ashes, till
the rest of it is ashes,
because the rest of
it is ashes, isn’t it?
Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: .
1.
Scott Fugate | January 20, 2012 at 4:16 am
Wow, I feel this one – and know exactly what & who you mean. He was one of the rare ones, with an authenticity and work ethic that kept on despite the continual pitter patter & piffle of everything that surrounded us. It always seemed to annoy him somewhat, and he always seemed above it all while working in it’s belly . . . although he rarely said it out loud.
2.
Craig | January 20, 2012 at 3:00 pm
Wow. These last several poems have been impressive. I’m glad you’re posting them.
I don’t know who this is, but this is amazing.
3.
Ruthann | January 22, 2012 at 9:58 pm
Thank you for writing what I can’t even allow myself to think.
4.
Jerry Sciarrio | January 25, 2012 at 5:23 am
Well constructed — well thought out — and a fitting commentary on a wonderful man. Thank you for sharing.
5.
KC Andrew | January 25, 2012 at 7:10 am
You captured him, as much as he can be captured.
6.
omnivorous cinephile | January 25, 2012 at 5:45 pm
Eloquent, Amy. A beautiful tribute to a beautiful man.