Archive for March, 2009
A Call For Poets of the New Reality
When I went to the Ani DiFranco concert a couple weeks ago, I didn’t expect
a) to fall in love with her as a performer, or
b) to find myself moved deeply, reminded of a passion born within me years ago in graduate school that I had somewhat forgotten about.
Yet both (a) and (b) happened when Ani and her band played the song “The Atom.” The lights seemed to get misty and the song had a husky quality to it as she sang:
the glory of the atom
begs a reverent word
the primary design
of the whole universe
yes, let us sing its praises
let us bow our heads in prayer
at the magnificent consciousness
incarnate there
Not only was a someone offering musical worship of a “scientific” particle of matter, but later in the song our troubled relationship to nature through the cause of science connects to our environmental crisis:
human beings are a cross
between monkeys and ants
you can see us from your spaceship
melting the polar ice caps
with our arroagance
summon a congress of angels
dressed in riot gear
we’ve got ourselves a serious situation
down here
It was gorgeous, moving.
Years ago, in graduate school, I took a class with Robert Nadeau, a historian of science who, along with a noted physicist, has written a number of books on “the new science,” quantum mechanics and new biology, that argue that what we learn from these new studies undermines the dualistic Cartesian and Newtonian thought that still dictates our philosophical concepts – in the humanities and elsewhere. They show that principles of nonlocality and complementarity that appear in the latest science give us new models for understanding humanity’s place in the world – we are a part of the whole, quite literally. And they stress that without this new understanding, we will continue to erode this world, and ourselves.
But Nadeua, in class and in his work, feels strongly that our culture is not going to change through intellectual argument alone. He calls for “poets of the new reality” to infuse scientific revelations with spirituality, knowing, it seems, that reason alone won’t have the heft to shift such imbedded ideals and behaviors. He and Kafatos say, speaking about the ecological crisis, that
the global revolution in ethical thought and behavior that is prerequisite to human survival may not occur unless intellectual understanding of the character of physical reality is wedded to profound religious or spiritual awareness… central to this vision would be a cosmos rippling with tension evolving out of itself endless examples of the awe and wonder of this seamlessly interconnected life… the astonishing fact of our being.
I found this quote in one of my papers, in which I tried to show how some contemporary poets seem to be attempting to use scientific fact to create a new theoretical landscape in which to consider ourselves no longer dominant masters of a subjugated earth, no longer alienated outcasts caught in Nietsche’s prisonhouse of the mind, no longer either separate and in opposition to the physical world nor completely, Romantically merged with it, but existing within it, and it within us, in a complementary, “both/and” framework.
Reading what I wrote about this reminded me how inspired I was at the time to write poetry that could do this important work… and how later, I felt like I found in Unitarian-Universalism a possible foundation for the spiritual piece of “the new reality”…
But in the midst of things, I had kind of forgotten about those idea. Listening to Ani the other night, I was heartened to feel that she, too, is a poet of the new reality. A song about the atom could have been a goofy They Might Be Giants anthem; instead, there was a loving, mystical quality to the music that made her words powerful.
And while I like The Streets’ song about our environmental crisis, “Dodo,” I believe that human beings aren’t going to be motivated to do what they need to do to save the planet by being confronted with a pessimistic dismissal of our value. It has the same empty effect as telling a kid that smoking a cigarette will kill her. Of course,she doesn’t want to die; but death is so far off, and so inevitable, and the wagging finger so chiding, all she does is light up another one.
When that same kid gets pregnant, though, and becomes aware of what smoking will do to the baby she feels kicking inside of her, she might be more motivated to stop smoking because of the hope of new life present and heavy within her. Hope and love will encourage her to change where a picture of doom only added to her nonchalance about her health.
I had a book of stories as a child that included one with what must be a common theme. It’s about some grimy old guy in a shack who gets saddled with an orphan baby while working in a mining camp. The baby’s sweet beauty makes the guy realize she needs a clean blanket; then he sees she needs a clean bed; then he sees she needs something pretty to look at, so he puts out flowers; soon his shack and his clothes and everything is spotless, clean, beautiful – his transformation spurred by beauty, adoration, love, and the sense of responsibility that such love imbues.
How does all this relate to The Park, you ask? The litter challenge. People aren’t going to stop tossing their Dorito bags on the oak tree roots because of a posted admonishment, even the threat of a fee. So what about the beauty of the place? Can we write poetry about it, recite with missionary zeal? Should Ani DiFranco do a song about it, preaching its glory and divinity?
Those of us who want to “save the environment” yearn for “everyone” to feel that we belong to the earth, to experience the special relationship, so that we treat it as we would a mother – this is familiar language.
In the microcosm of a small little park, how does that larger vision translate to the concrete space? How can we save the earth if we can’t even have enough care to stop littering on one square of grass and trees?
One thing I have noticed about this park, which saddens me greatly. There aren’t very many visitors to it. I happen to know there are plenty of families with kids along the surrounding streets – I’ve met some of them; I see their abandoned toys in their front yards when I take walks. But the park is more often than not empty. Why?
Is it that people just play in their own little squares of owned turf? Are they afraid of mingling with others?
If people felt ownership of this common space, perhaps it wouldn’t be neglected, trashed. Someone would care about it. It would shine proudly, like all the gleaming cars in our driveways…but maybe we are too isolated in our single family homes these days to know how to have a common space. Maybe we can’t understand and live out a harmonious relationship to the earth because we can’t even find a way to heal the split between ourselves and our communities, our neighbors down the street.
I don’t have much of an answer for how to get people in the park, how to get people loving it, like it is a baby in a shack.
All I know is, I believe that we have to start where we are, with what’s before us.
Each piece, each park, is part of and reflects the whole.
1 comment March 18, 2009
Returning and Re-turning

Dog in the Receding Snow
On my circuitous route to the park today, (isn’t circuitous the best word!), I passed by a sobbing car – rather, a woman burying herself into the carseats, weeping and wailing in misery. I had turned to look – she drove away – hurriedly -her cries echoing on the quiet side street – and me, full of questions, and memories – how many times I’ve been on the side of the road, alone in my car with my devastation, glassed in but somewhat on display -
Ah, suffering.
She drove away -
Suffering, so easy to itemize and analyze on either side of it – so easy to shrug it off when it’s just a memory you can hang in the closet. But when you’re in it, it feels as irreversible, as inescapable as your own skin.
Suffering or love – so easy to forget what they feel like when you’ve moved out of their grip. A similar forgetfulness that attends my sense of the seasons – when winter cold starts slapping me down, I am always stung with shock, even though it happens every year. And then the warmth that creeps over me, the hot pressing feet of the summer cat – again, the thrill of my first real sweat feels tremendous and new – though I felt it, the same heat, just the year before.
I feel somewhat like an idiot when this happens – again and again and again – except for the fact that there’s something resuscitating to my spirit and body to go through, yearly, these processes, as if I am – for I am! – a living thing.
There’s a paradox I keep getting pointed to about experience and living that has to do with being fully alive in the present moment and its feeling, whether it’s suffering or love, while at the same time holding the awareness that all things change and pass away.
This is, I believe, part of what Thomas More is alluding to in his book Care of the Soul, when he talks about love:
It isn’t necessary to make strong efforts to avoid past mistakes or to learn how to be clever about love. The advance we make after we have been devastated by love may be to be able simply to enter it freely once again, in spite of our suspicions, to draw ever closer to the darkness and hollowness that are mysteriously necessary in love.

Red Buds
Of course, it’s nicer to think about re-entering love freely – not suffering so much. Last night I was out late in the cold and complained aloud, “This is one of the moments when I feel like I should be Buddhistically just noticing how damn freezing I am, but instead all I really want to do is to shut my mind down, to not be aware of it, so I can survive.”
Shutting down certainly feels easier and more expedient, more practical and possible, than staying open and exposed, when one is experiencing suffering, physically or emotionally. The problem is that when we shut down, we don’t notice or learn anything from our experience. And there’s a difference between experiencing recurring seasons or situations with a full fresh presence and going through the cycling treadmill of the same thing over and over because we keep our eyes shut so tightly we don’t look and see that we are going nowhere…Not to mention, when we don’t fully experience our suffering at the time it occurs, it comes up later, surfacing from the lidded depths.
Watching that woman drive off in her car, I felt like I could have been witnessing myself four years ago, four months ago, fourteen years ago, driving off in my Ford, my white K-car…
And I have a feeling, I will find myself there again. The thing is, can I practice entering these moments now, openly, enough so that the next time I am there in that cold place of despair I won’t be shut off, doors locked to the experience? So that I don’t drive away from myself, trying to escape what can’t be avoided? And will I remind myself, will I look out the window and see a woman walking on the side of the road, and know that that was me, is me again, that all things change, and to let that vision – that deeply knitted knowledge of the whole – allow me the comforting sense of the larger turning and returning of the world?

Tree
To love fully, to feel fully, to suffer fully – to step out of my enclosures, my habits of being closed to the senses – to walk to the park, watch the snow returning into the earth, and make my footprints there, as if for the first time – for it is the first time this foot has touched this piece of snow, and it is an old stepping, and the new buds coming are themselves only themselves, though their coming is eternal -
Let me return to the same place that is never the same, and to know it.
1 comment March 5, 2009